Respond to one of the following two questions. Develop a clear line of analysis and point of view. Integrate quotes from at least two Humanities texts we have discussed this semester into your response. Back up your argument with plenty of examples from VERTIGO. Please use the questions as jumping off points and don't try to cover everything in them. Focus on what interests you most in the film. As always, please tell us something we didn't already know! Write as much as you wish, but note that it would probably be difficult to respond in anything less than 200-250 words. Pay attention to what your peers' have observed before you, so as to ensure that the conversation is advancing. You may have until Thursday before class to complete your response. For reminder of the character names, see this link: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0052357/. Good luck!
1) How does VERTIGO illustrate, complicate, or challenge Riviere and Grosz' idea of "womanliness as masquerade"? For Riviere, there is no "essence" to womanliness. Instead, the qualities stereotypically associated with femininity-- such as passivity, coyness, and appearance--are a "lure" and a "mask" to capture and deceive the patriarchal male gaze. Similarly, for Grosz, under patriarchy, there are socially constructed subject positions for heterosexual "masculine" and "feminine" desire. The man "exalts" the woman by placing her on a pedestal and acts as her knight in shining armor. The woman, who adopts all of the accessories of femininity (centered around appearance) cooly waits for the man to woo her. According to Grosz, however, the man projects his own narcissism onto his object of desire (the woman who is actually interchangeable). The woman, by contrast, who superficially seems to have all the independence associated with narcissism, is actually in the relatively powerless position of object rather than subject. She is dependent on the man's desire for her own self-esteem. Meanwhile, the man often "splits" woman into the angelic "ego-ideal" that he rescues and protects (again, serving his own narcissism) and the debased "whore," on whom he can project his socially unacceptable desires. Woman is coded as "being the phallus" (for the man) while the man is coded as "having the phallus" (to offer the woman). From this perspective, since no one can actually be or have the symbolic phallus (it's always a performance), and the power dynamic between the masculine and feminine positions is so imbalanced, it's actually inaccurate to even speak of heterosexual "relationships" under patriarchy. As Lacan (in)famously wrote; "there is no sexual relation." In what ways does VERTIGO illustrate aspects of Riviere and Grosz' arguments about femininity, masculinity, and desire? In what ways might it also challenge them? Your are encouraged to embrace complexity in your response. Please feel free, as you employ each text, to push them forward in new directions. 2) What is the relationship between loss, death, and desire in VERTIGO? From a psychoanalytic perspective, desire is structured by loss. This includes the loss of our earliest object-choices, which we overcome only imperfectly through the resolution of the Oedipus Complex. As Edmondson points out, in love we are always looking for what we fantasize that we once had, or believe that we should have had, in our childhood. Throughout our lives, as Freud notes, "every object-finding is really a re-finding." With loss, an object often gains new and powerful qualities that we did not notice when we actually had it. The object, in a sense, only becomes real after we no longer have access to it. Then, it is only after a painful period of mourning, where we detach our libido from a lost object, that can we love another. When we fail to give up what we have lost--when we cling to it in our psyche even to the point that it starts to persecute us--mourning fails and becomes melancholia. The phenomenon of loss, and our responses to it, are also conditioned by psychic time, where past-present-present future, as Loewald observes, do not move forward in a linear fashion but continually shape and reshape each other. In general, no matter how much we search after an object that we believe will complete our sense of lack--in everything from consumer objects, to careers, to relationships--we are never able to find the one that fully satisfies our desire. Lack therefore actually serves to sustain desire; it keeps it moving. Death, the ultimate loss, may then appear as the most coveted object of desire; the only way that desire could ever fully be satisfied. On an unconcious level, according to the concept of death drive, we may be driven by a compulsion to repeat our earliest failures and pulled towards the lifelessness of an archaic past. Death, like the experience of Vertigo, both frightens and fascinates us. In what ways does VERTIGO treat the relationship between loss, desire, and death?
72 Comments
Sophie-Leprohon Watters
3/10/2018 01:45:32 pm
Topic 1:
Reply
Sophie-Leprohon Watters
3/10/2018 05:39:29 pm
*VERTIGO
Reply
Julian
19/10/2018 02:06:52 pm
Very thoughtful response, Sophie. It's funny that you make the slip with REAR WINDOW, which plays with similar themes of castration. I'm not entirely convinced that Scottie sees Midge as a "masculine" threat. I do think, however, that she lacks the "mysterious" quality on which he can project his own narcissism. She's become too much of the "overbearing " mother in his mind, which serves to remind him of his vulnerability/castration. There's a lot of good material in this response and it would be interesting to see how you would apply it to the film's ending. Nice job. ✔
Reply
Emily Trankarov
3/10/2018 04:28:30 pm
Topic 1
Reply
Julian Nemeth
19/10/2018 02:10:53 pm
Very good response, Emily. Nice use of evidence from the film. I do think this response would be even more effective if it more clearly delineated Judy/Madeleine's conscious/unconcious wielding of the "mask" of femininity. There are times when she's presumably quite self-conscious in her manipulation and other's where the mask seems to become her face. Overall, good job. ✔
Reply
Meghan Rulli
4/10/2018 10:55:11 am
I strongly believe that Grosz belief on constructed subject positions between heterosexual masculine and feminine desire is illustrated in Vertigo between Judy and Scottie. It’s evident that Scottie believes he’s saving Madeleine, and actually enjoys it, as he tells her “I’m responsible for you now”. Madeleine is waiting for Scottie to woo her, and plays the masquerade of the innocent and helpless woman for him. Once Madeleine ‘dies’, and Judy is now in the picture, we can assess that Judy initially looks, like Emily said, like ‘an independent, self-assured working woman,’ but because of her strong love towards Scottie, she becomes the narcissistic woman. She is highly dependent on Scottie’s desire for her own self-esteem, when in reality Scottie’s desire is for a dead girl, Madeleine. She “strives to make her body into the phallus” as Grosz states, she dyes her hair blonde to resemble Madeleine and wears less make up to become the object of desire for Scottie.
Reply
Meghan Rulli
4/10/2018 10:55:54 am
Answer to Topic 1
Reply
Julian
19/10/2018 02:13:31 pm
Meghan,
Reply
Julia Prud'Homme
4/10/2018 03:59:55 pm
Topic 1
Reply
Julian Nemeth
19/10/2018 02:19:39 pm
Very good post, Julia. I appreciate the clarity of your thesis. This would be even stronger with just a little more detail on how Scotty's "masculinity" and "femininity" is expressed in the film. One could argue, for instance, that he is symbolically castrated again in the courtroom scene after Madeline's death. If you develop this into an essay, I would also like to see you expand upon the question of Judy's agency. Good job. ✔
Reply
Idia Boncheva
6/10/2018 04:49:14 pm
TOPIC 1:
Reply
Julian Nemeth
19/10/2018 02:22:48 pm
Nice post, Idia. I would only add that Midge already has some of that "motherly" concern from the first scene in the film. There's also the fact that her painting over Carlotta represents both her desire to become the object of desire but also her attempt to awaken Scotty from his descent into obsession. Nice job. ✔
Reply
Kelly Rosialda
7/10/2018 03:10:15 pm
Topic 2
Reply
Julian Nemeth
19/10/2018 02:27:02 pm
I'm glad to see this thoughtful focus on Judy's psychology, Kelly. That said, this post would be more effective if you moved more quickly into the film at the start and also included the two references to course texts noted in the instruction. This shows a lot of potential, though and I look forward to hearing your thought on this and other films develop further. ✔-
Reply
Taïna Dushime
7/10/2018 07:41:17 pm
Topic 2
Reply
Julian Nemeth
19/10/2018 02:38:01 pm
Very promising response, Taina. I love the way you have honed in on the Lacanian concept of "lack" that motivates desire. The connections you draw to "Beyond the Pleasure Principle" and "On Transience" are also fascinating. If you choose to expand this into your final essay, which I encourage, you would probably want to go into some more detail on what exactly Scotty's desire is circling around. You could also expand upon the failure of his mourning, which leads him to the hospital. Overall, this shows serious promise. Looking forward to seeing your work continue to develop. ✔ +
Reply
Victoria Caputo
8/10/2018 03:48:29 pm
[TOPIC 2]
Reply
Victoria Caputo
8/10/2018 04:11:41 pm
Please disregard this answer, it lacks quotes from the Humanities texts. My official answer is the one that follows.
Reply
Victoria Caputo
8/10/2018 04:12:41 pm
[TOPIC 2]
Reply
Julian Nemeth
19/10/2018 02:43:26 pm
Great post, Victoria. Clear argument and effective use of evidence. To push this just a little further, I would be curious to see you expand on the second part of the Edmondson quotation regarding repeating our humiliations as punishment. Overall, very good job. ✔+
Reply
Ameera Kabir
8/10/2018 05:52:09 pm
As mentioned by Taïna and Victoria, Scotty’s desire for Judy is fuelled by his refusal to mourn for Madeleine. Whatever love he might have felt for Judy is possible due to the latter’s existence; the future that he wants to create for them is an imitation of the past he once had with Madeleine, as a result Judy’s importance is dependant on Madeleine. In reality, Scotty does not desire Judy at all, but Madeleine’s ghost. By pursuing a relationship with Judy, Scotty is attempting to return to a time when Madeleine was still alive, and in remaining there, regain his former happiness. He perceives Judy’s transformation into Madeleine as the resurrection of a corpse, thus bringing the past back into the present. While attempting to recreate Madeleine, Scotty pays her more attention than he ever did when she was alive, in other words, reproducing her image required more contemplation than being with her did. When she was alive, she was the object of his desires, in other words, the phallus. Her existence was easily replaceable with another equally vulnerable woman, since her identity revolved solely around his longing for her. Her transition from “phantom” to “idol” is what consolidates her existence. In sum, Scotty wants Madeleine more now that she is no longer with him and will do anything he in his power to bring her back. However, when he does succeed in recreating Madeleine through Judy, he is unsatisfied with the results. He is unable to find the object that he was looking for. Edmundson notes that “even the best-made reality, is too poor for our hopes”, and in that sense, Judy is a poor substitute for a dream. Scotty’s fantasy will never be realized since neither Judy nor Madeleine herself fit the idolized image he has created in his mind.
Reply
Ameera Kabir
8/10/2018 05:52:57 pm
Response to Q.2
Reply
Julian Nemeth
19/10/2018 02:49:13 pm
Good work, Ameera. To push this even further, you might focus on the fact that Madeleine, in reality, never actually existed. While I see you gesturing towards the Grosz text, note that the instructions called for two quotations. Overall, nice work. ✔
Reply
Angele Wen
8/10/2018 05:58:28 pm
As Kelly said, loss, death and desire are an endless cycle. In Vertigo, Scottie fell in love with his own vision of Madeleine, rather than Madeleine herself. He idealized Madeleine as the “perfect” woman and wanted her to be his. When he thought she jumped out of the tower, he lost her, but didn't want to admit she died. For Scottie, she was still alive, especially when he sees Judy in the restaurant, he was more convinced that she didn't die. He desired Judy, but realizes she is quite different from the Madeleine of his invention and desired to transform her so he could bring back what he lost. It's just like Emily Dickinson's poem: “'Tis so appalling - it exhIlarates -”. Judy looks like Madeleine, but isn't exactly like Madeleine in her appearance and personality, which frustrates Scottie a lot and drives him crazy. What he didn't know is that the Madeleine he once knew only existed in his imagination. His love for her blinded him. He didn't see any imperfection in her and expected Judy to be exactly like her. We often compare our boyfriend or girlfriend to our ex, because we want to find what was missing from the first one in the second one, but also re-find the positive points. Humans desire what is perfect and always seek improvement in the next one, after losing the first one. The first one never dies and we will always desire more from the second one until we accept the loss of the first one. Scottie wasn't capable of loving Judy properly, because he couldn't mourn his loss of Madeleine. His capacity of love is full: “We possess, as it seems, a certain amount of capacity for love—what we call libido” (ON TRANSIENCE p.306).
Reply
Angele Wen
8/10/2018 05:59:31 pm
TOPIC 2
Reply
Julian Nemeth
19/10/2018 02:52:51 pm
There are some nice observations about loss and desire, here. Your points about relationships and comparisons are insightful and would have been well-supported with some Adam Phillips quotations. I do think that the organization of the post could be stronger (avoid ending with a quotation that should be analyzed) and some more evidence from the film could have been provided. The Emily Dickinson quote, while well chosen, would have been more effective with just a little more analysis. Overall, though, a thoughtful response. ✔-
Reply
Kathleen Fabella
9/10/2018 12:23:51 am
-Topic #2-
Reply
Julian Nemeth
19/10/2018 02:56:30 pm
Great post, Kathleen. The end comes like a gut punch. ✔+
Reply
Isabella Martino
9/10/2018 01:09:42 am
TOPIC 1
Reply
Julian Nemeth
19/10/2018 03:02:33 pm
Solid work, Isabella. I appreciate the way you are both showing the way a theory seems to fit the film but also the way the film resists it. That said, in this case, it's important to note that especially for Riviere ambivalence about playing the feminine role is one of her core points. She underlines the way that woman will often consciously play the feminine role as a way to ward off attacks from men. It's also clear from her case study that her patient is quite resentful of having to engage in the masquerade for male colleagues that she looks down upon. Overall, solid work. ✔
Reply
Patricia Brassard
9/10/2018 12:42:11 pm
Answer to topic one:
Reply
Patricia Brassard
9/10/2018 12:44:41 pm
‘‘A Rose for Emily’’
Reply
Julian Nemeth
19/10/2018 03:07:21 pm
Excellent response, Patricia. Small point: make sure to capitalize the title of books and always include page numbers for quotations. I also think that one sentence explaining the reference to "A Rose for Emily" would also have made the connection stronger. Finally, a reference to Scotty's symbolic castrations would help explain his desire to play the "masculine" part. Still, this is a great response. I would love to read an extended version in your final essay. ✔+
Reply
Wendy Lopez Ponce
9/10/2018 08:23:47 pm
Topic #2
Reply
Julian Nemeth
19/10/2018 03:12:22 pm
Very good response, Wendy. The point about loss is well taken. I do think you might expand just a little bit on Scotty's seeming obsession to have Madeleine again, but your point is well taken. It's interesting to note, for instance, that it's when the Madeleine costume finally becomes "complete" (with the necklace) that the spell on Scotty is finally broken. ✔
Reply
Marilena Mignacca
9/10/2018 09:03:14 pm
Topic #1
Reply
Julian Nemeth
19/10/2018 03:17:35 pm
There are some good points here, Marilena. I do think that this post would be even more effective with a little engagement with some of your peer's upthread. I also think you could say a little bit more about Judy: if Scotty didn't love "her" why does she stay? I think Judy's "competition" with Madeleine (who after all, is a version of herself) would also be worth further unpacking. ✔
Reply
Lyna Ikram Bayou
9/10/2018 09:36:14 pm
As some have mentioned before, Scottie’s desire toward Judy seems to be sustained by his wish to fulfill the void left by the loss of Madeline. Scottie and Judy’s relationship perfectly illustrates the relation between loss, desire and death in the movie VERTIGO. Scottie is devastated by the loss of Madeline. For a second time, his fear of heights had led him to failure and to the loss of someone close—first with his colleague falling from the roof, and then with Madeline jumping (being pushed) from the tower. Considering he never makes it past the first stages of the “7 stages of grief”, he hasn’t been able to properly mourn the death of his lover. That is why, although death is supposed to be the ultimate loss, when Scottie found Judy, he took it as an opportunity to keep his Madeline alive; to bring her back to life. He never really got closure nor accepted her death, and so he repeats his past by recreating the life he had before, with Madeline. In this new narrative, he, who had failed his friend and his lover in the past, is giving himself the active role Just like the child described in Freud’s “Beyond the Pleasure Principle”. Scottie was “in a passive situation—he was overpowered by the experience; but, by repeating it…, he took on an active part” (Freud 16). Also, our protagonist, throughout Judy’s make-over, seemed to always think something was missing. Because “desire is always the desire for something that is missing and thus involves a constant search for the missing object” (Homer 85), Scottie tried to bring Madeline “back to life” in the most accurate way; he considered every small detail and kept looking for what was missing to create the perfect “mise-en-scène”. He would even go as far as to buy the exact same clothes Madeline use to wear to ensure the perfect recreation of her through Judy, until he was satisfied. However, Scottie is not the only one with strong desire and a repeating habit. Judy has it too. She wanted to be loved by Gavin and accepted to lose herself by impersonating someone else to fulfill that desire. We would’ve thought she would learn from her mistakes, but she did not. In fact, she accepts once again to abandon herself, her identity, to become the object of Scottie’s love. She gives in and lets him transform her into whatever he wants, as long as he promises to love her back. She too is stuck in the impulse to repeat the past instead of moving on. Therefore, both through their relationship and individually, Scottie and Judy manage to illustrate and put in action the correlation between loss, desire and death in the movie VERTIGO.
Reply
Lyna Ikram Bayou
11/10/2018 07:25:36 pm
This is a response for question 2.
Reply
Julian Nemeth
19/10/2018 03:22:10 pm
Great post, Lyna. I love how you connect Judy's repetition compulsion with Scotty's. You might even underline this point by noting instead of following Elster in playing the role, seemingly, she is now "herself" actively choosing to deceive Scotty (even as it seems as though she is totally his pawn). To make your response more effective, try to end your posts with more of an "open conclusion." There's zero need to circle back to the exact same point you've already made in the introduction. This closes off the much more open conclusion your analysis seemed to be building towards. Overall, great job. This would be worth continuing to explore in your final essay. ✔+
Reply
Isabeli Pizzani
9/10/2018 10:15:18 pm
We can also observe the relationship between loss, desire and death presented in VERTIGO in Ferguson attraction for Madeleine. John is an acrophobic man, in altitude he is filled with vertigo, this desire to jump, but held by the fear of death. When he meets Madeline, he falls in love with her. She is not only mysterious and distant, but she is also married, unavailable. As Homer said, “[The Thing] is the desire to fill the emptiness or void at the core of subjectivity and the symbolic that creates the Thing, as opposed to the loss of some original Thing creating the desire to find it.” In other words, we can’t desire something if we already have it. So, Scottie desires Madeleine because he knows he would never “own” her, and he will always be seeking her, as Phillips said: “The wish to own someone - or the belief that one does - is an acknowledgement of its impossibility”. She is a representation of his objet a, “the object-cause of [his] desire” that is also unattainable (Homer, 2005).
Reply
Isabeli Pizzani
9/10/2018 10:19:26 pm
Answer to question 2
Reply
Julian Nemeth
19/10/2018 03:27:12 pm
Insightful response, Isabeli. I like your point about Madeleine embodying Scotty's fear and fascination with death, which is also reflected in his vertigo. While I think the organization of this response could be a little stronger and more examples from the film could be provided, overall very good work. ✔
Reply
Chris Morgan Arseneau
9/10/2018 11:00:14 pm
(Topic 1)
Reply
Julian Nemeth
19/10/2018 05:43:51 pm
Good work, Chris. ✔+
Reply
Vanessa Amar
10/10/2018 12:37:52 am
Topic 2
Reply
Julian Nemeth
19/10/2018 05:46:37 pm
Solid response, Vanessa, but note this angle has also been discussed in some depth upthread (notably in Taina and Lyna's response). I think you could push the analysis even further. ✔-
Reply
Doha Ani
10/10/2018 07:42:00 pm
Question # 2
Reply
Julian Nemeth
19/10/2018 05:50:08 pm
Solid work, Doha. Make sure to write titles in caps lock and include both quotations. With a little more organization and a stronger thesis, this would be an excellent post. ✔
Reply
Larissa Szaniszlo-Luty
10/10/2018 08:23:43 pm
Topic #2
Reply
Julian Nemeth
19/10/2018 05:52:21 pm
This is a compelling response, Larissa. I would like you to spend just a little more time unpacking your very apt choice of quotes. This could be fruitfully expanded into your final essay. Nice work. ✔+
Reply
Jade Karakaly
10/10/2018 08:53:11 pm
Topic 2:
Reply
Julian Nemeth
19/10/2018 05:55:27 pm
This is a very strong response, Jade. I like your extensive use of evidence from the film. To take this to the next level, you might have included just a line or two about Scotty's response to Madeleine's death and his obsession with reshaping Judy and how this connects with the intermingling of death and desire. Overall, nice job. This could be a very good starting point for your final essay. ✔
Reply
Cato Usher
10/10/2018 08:53:34 pm
TOPIC 2
Reply
Julian Nemeth
19/10/2018 06:00:57 pm
This is an excellent response, Cato. You do a great job opening up the film with the concepts of the real and objet petit a. To take this post to the next level, you would want to include a quotation from Edmondson (the instructions ask for two and the point you are citing from him isn't really clear here). One point to consider : is "Judy" the objet petit a or "something about Judy," something that he can't quite put his finger on? Overall, great job. ✔
Reply
Hannah Di Francesco
10/10/2018 09:19:15 pm
Q.1
Reply
Julian Nemeth
19/10/2018 06:07:05 pm
Solid work, Hannah. I would just make sure to distinguish between Grosz (who does discuss masculinity) and Riviere (who says very little about it in the text we read). Moreover, note that for Riviere ambivalence is everywhere in femininity. There is certainly no "natural" accepting of this role and there is much frustration, often expressed unconsciously, for the role woman are forced to play. All that said, I do like the way that you are working to complicate the theories by reading the film back against them. Nice job.
Reply
Julian Nemeth
19/10/2018 06:07:31 pm
✔
Julia Bifulco
10/10/2018 09:24:36 pm
[Question Two]
Reply
Julian Nemeth
19/10/2018 06:09:50 pm
Solid work, Julia. I would just add that so far down the thread you would want to engage similar posts by your peers. Also note the instructions calls for two quotes. Finally, I think you could push your analysis even further by discussing the fact that the original Madeleine was always already a "fake." That is, not only does she become stronger as a memory, she never existed a real object in the first place. ✔-
Reply
Jenna Howor
10/10/2018 09:37:30 pm
TOPIC 2
Reply
Julian Nemeth
19/10/2018 06:16:36 pm
Solid work, Jenna. There are many nice insights here but the post moves from point to point too quickly to have a strong overarching argument. Looking forward to seeing your ideas develop further in future work. ✔-
Reply
Maria Fatima Agustin
10/10/2018 10:38:57 pm
Topic 2
Reply
Julian Nemeth
19/10/2018 06:19:10 pm
Great work, Maria! I really like how you shifted the conversation to Judy's subjectivity here. There are minor issues in the writing (remember to use caps locks in the forum when using film titles; make sure to include the correct author's name in parentheses), but the overall thrust of your argument--and the evidence you provide--is eye-opening. Please keep up the good work. ✔+
Reply
David Boghen
10/10/2018 10:43:09 pm
Topic 2:
Reply
Julian Nemeth
19/10/2018 06:24:31 pm
Very good post, David. Your focus on the desire and loss is great. I would only add two minor points: is Scotty really "happy again" when he is with Judy? In the scenes where he attempts to make her over into Madeleine he seems disturbingly obsessed. There's also the question of whether Scotty consciously wanted to push Madeleine over the edge and was somehow disappointed that he couldn't. We just don't have enough evidence for this from the film to say this with certainty. That said, I do think it's plausible to suggest that he wanted to murder the *idea* of Madeleine by exposing Judy to the site of the real Madeleine's murder. Overall, though, this is a very thoughtful post with nice application of challenging Lacanian concepts. ✔
Reply
Ben Carson
10/10/2018 10:57:38 pm
2-
Reply
Julian Nemeth
19/10/2018 06:30:39 pm
Solid work,Ben. In the future, please make sure that all quotes come from the actual texts rather than the mio summaries as the first one is here (though I like being quoted!). Also note that Scotty doesn't develop vertigo but that the condition is partly what made it impossible for him to save his fellow officer. Finally, the point about desiring Judy's death is interesting, but would need to be a little more elaborated. All that said, you do make some good points about loss and desire in the film. ✔-
Reply
Bridget Griffin
10/10/2018 11:51:41 pm
2) Something that complicates the relationship between loss, death, and desire in Hitchcock’s VERTIGO is the fact that both Scottie and the audience are tricked into believing such terrible falsehoods that, when the truth is revealed, it is completely gut-wrenching. We’re lead to believe that Madeleine killed herself, propelling Scottie into a state of utter melancholia. In his deep sadness, he finds it impossible to come to terms with her death, searching for her everywhere. As Freud puts it in “On Transience”, Scottie cannot move on, “even when a substitute lies ready to hand” (307). Midge’s presence in the movie puts further emphasis on this point. Clearly there was a time when Scottie felt as though he could be attracted to her; they used to be engaged. He cannot now attach any amount of libido to her being, however, for she is not Madeleine.
Reply
Julian Nemeth
19/10/2018 06:38:17 pm
Very good post, Bridget. There are some excellent observations, here. If you consider developing this further into an essay, which I encourage, you could further explore the crucial point of Madeleine never really existing. This is one of the most radical facets of the film. Isn't it possible that this reveals a core truth about the nature of desire? That it's always centered around a lack rather than the illusory presence? Midge's overbearing presence in Scotty's psychic economy also affirms this fact. I also appreciated that you cited Loewald's observation about the personal myth. I do think that this post might have included a bit more evidence from the film and it also ends rather abruptly (and unintentionally sounds like you wanted Judy dead), but there are many great ideas here. This could be a great starting point for your final essay. Nice job. ✔+
Reply
Avraham Cymbalist
11/10/2018 07:20:24 am
Q2
Reply
Julian Nemeth
19/10/2018 06:45:38 pm
There are some really nice and unexpected observations here, Avraham. I do think the final passage on Scotty's need for dominance in the relationship would probably connect better with Grosz but your application of Freud is intriguing, though it could be expanded upon. Nice job. ✔+
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
INSTRUCTIONSPlease respond in the Comments section. To see this section, just click the red "comments" line). To create a new response, use the "Leave a Reply" box. |